• MysticKetchup@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    1 year ago

    People have invested a lot into Twitter. They’ve built social networks there, they have brands or client bases for people who make money and it’s also just where most people are. Leaving means giving up most of what they need or want Twitter for. It’s a captive audience

    • Mic_Check_One_Two@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yeah, it’s the same problem for people who rely on exposure to get business. Artists, for example, are pretty much locked into Twitter. Because they rely on a large user base for their work to be seen and spread. And switching to another site (even if it has better quality of life) isn’t feasible if the massive user base doesn’t already exist there.

        • galloog1@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          And that’s exactly what needs to happen. Organizations post to both and get the benefits of both. Even better, it allows for better segmentation of user types. Lemmy and Mastodon users tend towards a different demographics by self selection with no privacy infringements needed. The same applies to the classic differences between Twitter and Facebook.

        • Fisk400@feddit.nu
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          That depends on the kind of art you do. The more “lucrative” kinds of art is not allowed on Instagram.