• db2@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    318
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    If it’s not too hard to charge the fees it’s not too hard to name them. Period.

    • AnonymousLlama@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      135
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yeah that’s the most brazen part. They’re more than happy to pull in a dozen set of fees, but cry when they have to clearly list them so people aren’t taken advantage of. This is the type of rubbish that the “free market” produces and why there needs to be some level of government oversight.

      • WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        73
        ·
        1 year ago

        “Too hard to list our fees” = “consumers will see how hard we’re fucking them before they sign a contract”

          • Master@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            This is where I am at. Got a phone survey from comcast. Gave them 1 star on every category except how likely am I to continue to use comcast at which point I gave them a 10… because it’s a monopoly and it’s literally the only ISP in my area. I pay 150 dollars for 10mb/5mb service with a 3tb cap. If I go two blocks in any direction I can get 100mb/50mb for 40 bucks with no data cap. Even the exact same plan from comcast 2 blocks away is half the price with 8 times the speed and no cap.

            • DominusOfMegadeus@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              1 year ago

              Check out if Verizon has 5G Hone Internet coverage in your area. It’s $35 a month if you have your phone plan with them, as well. (I do not work for Verizon)

            • db2@sopuli.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Verizon and T-Mobile have home internet via cellular faster and cheaper than you’re getting.

    • balloflearning@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      39
      ·
      1 year ago

      Sounds like posturing to add a new fee for being required to list their fees if their weak argument gets thrown out by the FCC.

      • takeda@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        41
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        With ISP what is really need is Local-loop unbundling but extending to ISPs.

        Those that are old enough to use DSL in early 2000, might remember there was a lot of ISPs to chose from. The reason for it was that due to Title II telco companies were required to lease lines to their competitors. When cable started to be popular, ISPs lobbied politicians to categorize it under Title I which removed that requirement. We got Internet back to be categorized as Title II, but this specific rule was excluded and this is what is necessary to bring the competition.

        • theneverfox@pawb.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          Seriously. We’ve even pushed it onto cell providers, which has been great for consumers - yet we let ISPs push laws which make nonprofit community options illegal in many states

          We’ve paid for their networks many times over at this point, and yet we still have some of the worst Internet in the developed world