• SirEDCaLot@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    6 months ago

    I agree. Even at $120 each. 120 times tens of millions is serious fucking cash. We need to have a couple of big companies go bankrupt over this shit. Then maybe they will start taking it seriously. Perhaps at that point maintaining personal data on people will be seen as a liability rather than an asset. And that’s what we really need.

    • slurpinderpin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      6 months ago

      Yep data protection should be life or death. Either that or make the executives personally responsible ie the fines come out of their pockets

      • SirEDCaLot@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        6 months ago

        Yup. We need more of the corporate death penalty. And when corporations are so big that ‘killing’ them would harm the economy, I argue we’re back to too big to fail. Maybe the answer is giant fines, and if the company can’t pay, wipe out the largest shareholders and then resell the stock over time. Make people’s personal information a giant hot potato that nobody wants to be holding.

        • SirEDCaLot@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          6 months ago

          Disagree. Breaking the corporate veil would have a whole lot of unintended consequences and would basically kill investment as a concept. I agree we need to do more about corporations that violate the law with impunity and get wrist slaps. I don’t think that’s it.

            • SirEDCaLot@lemmy.today
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              6 months ago

              Because it would greatly increase the cost and risk of investment. Think not just for billionaires, but for anybody. Imagine somebody buys a couple tens of thousands of dollars of a stock as part of their retirement, that company does something bad, and now not only do they lose their investment but they lose the rest of their retirement also.

              I am all for wiping out shareholders, especially big ones, when a company does something super stupid. There should be an incentive for shareholders to hold companies they invest in accountable.

              But suggesting that company owners become personally liable for the actions of those companies, especially when those equity owners have little or no control over the decisions of the company, that is a recipe for disaster.

              • explodicle@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                6 months ago

                Isn’t that the whole point of insurance? They assess the risk of that liability and average it out over time so you just pay a little bit of your return.

                • SirEDCaLot@lemmy.today
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  6 months ago

                  Oh I’m sure there would be insurance for that, but it would be expensive. It would dramatically reduce the amount of overall investment in the nation. That is a very bad thing, it would slow down the rate of our economy and innovation. Don’t get me wrong, the current setup where companies treat your data like an asset and then lose it and nothing happens is broken. There need to be stiff penalties for it. Corporate death penalty even, especially with an ending of all too big to fail. I’m talking penalties scary to the point that whatever profit could be made from your personal information isn’t worth the risk of having it, companies are scared to collect info. This would especially be true if there is negligence involved, like when companies put their databases on open S3 buckets. Companies should be scared shitless of that. But destroying our system of investment is not the answer.

                  • explodicle@sh.itjust.works
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    ·
                    6 months ago

                    The cost of that insurance doesn’t just disappear - today it’s paid by ordinary folks left holding the bill. A company that can’t afford to pay for its expected damages is doing more harm than help to the economy.

                    This isn’t just an answer to leaked databases. Companies can deliver profits when things go well, and then disappear after they ruin thousands of people’s lives.