• Dukeofdummies@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    I am so confused by this, why does there need to be AI involved in this at all?

    If somebody has a complaint, pull the footage, then the plaintiff goes over the footage and makes their case against the police officer. Why would an AI be necessary to find complaints that are not being complained about?

    I feel like it’s a technology solution for what should be a “more transparency and a better system” solution. Make complaints easier and reduce the fear factor of making complaints.

    • bhmnscmm@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      9 months ago

      The people most likely to be abused by police are the least likely to be able or willing to file a formal complaint.

      • Dukeofdummies@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        9 months ago

        So fix that. Don’t make an AI to dole out justice against police like some messed up lottery. This is such a hollow solution in my mind. AI struggles to identify a motorcycle, people expect it to identify abuse?

        • quirzle@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          So fix that.

          Were it so simple, it would have been fixed decades ago. The difference is that having AI review the footage is actually feasible.

          • Dukeofdummies@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            9 months ago

            Until you realize that the people who make the final decision on whether something the AI saw is indeed too far or extreme are the exact same people making the decision now and all we’ve succeeded in doing is creating a million dollar system that makes it look like they’re trying to change.

            • quirzle@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              7
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              9 months ago

              So what’s you’re proposed solution? Your directive to “fix that” was a bit light on details.

              This is a step in the right direction. The automated reviews will supplement, not replace, the reviewing triggered by manual reports you supported in your initial comment. I’d argue the pushback from police unions is a sign that it actually might lead to some change, given the reasoning the give in the article.

    • RobotToaster@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      I’m just theorising how AI could be used, but consider the situation where someone makes a complaint, but doesn’t remember the exact time of the incident (say they remember it was within a six hour time frame for this example), or what the officer looked like.

      You have (for example) 20 officers on duty it could be potentially be, in a six hour time frame, that’s 120 hours or 5 days of footage. An AI can use facial recognition to find the complainant within minutes.