• mechoman444@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    104
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    Let’s for a second take stock of what’s happening here.

    The ad revenue is falling short of the projected prediction of what it was supposed to be. As in the profit from ad revenue did not reach that arbitrary number.

    Reddit is still grossly profitable.

    This is the same kind of headline that says Facebook lost 11 bagillion dollars but in reality they didn’t lose a dime they just didn’t make as much as they wanted to.

    • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      33
      ·
      1 year ago

      The difference with Facebook is that it is a public company, so it does have to grow every year to have value for investors.

      Reddit doesn’t. It’s existing private investors can splot the profit and be just fine. They just want a huge payout that will only come from an IPO.

      • mechoman444@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        19
        ·
        1 year ago

        And the issue with consistent growth in billion dollar companies is that it’s not sustainable. We can’t just keep pilling on profits on top of profits to sate investors insecurities.

        • RubberElectrons@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          16
          ·
          1 year ago

          These morons will try though, their strategy invariably seems to be building the Jenga tower as high as possible, thinking they’ll be “quick” or “smart” enough to sell their shares before it tumbles.

          It’s gambling, but with people’s livelihoods.

          • AutistoMephisto@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            I can’t wait for all the news articles about the massive layoffs at Reddit, though it will be sad to see the massive droves of employees shuffling out the door with their personal effects like they did when the Enron scandal broke.

          • AutistoMephisto@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            I can’t wait for all the news articles about the massive layoffs at Reddit, though it will be sad to see the massive droves of employees shuffling out the door with their personal effects like they did when the Enron scandal broke.

      • wicked@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        1 year ago

        Are you not aware that public companies split the profits too? They do not need to grow to have value for investors.

        • Chessmasterrex@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          1 year ago

          Not all of them do that. There are growth stocks and dividend stocks. Growth stocks typically don’t pay dividends, but instead reinvest the dividend back into the company. Amazon, Alphabet and Berkshire Hathaway don’t pay dividends.

          • wicked@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Of course not. But they can, whenever they choose to. Parent comment said they have to grow since they are public, unlike private companies like Reddit.

      • SCB@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        so it does have to grow every year to have value for investors

        This gets said a lot but it is not true for a couple reasons.

        1: With an IPO you’re not as dependent upon individual investors, and as your value grows - which often has nothing to do with your company’s performance, you obtain additional funding.

        2: private or large-scale investors will literally have you sign contracts stating X% return on investment is what you owe them - once you surpass your return on investment, unless you seek additional funding, significant growth pressure is gone. Most companies immediately seek additional funding, which is how this gets interpreted as “requires perpetual growth.”

        If this includes % of revenue, then yeah, your investor will want you to make wise choices, but they own that percentage in perpetuity, so there is generally not the pressure related to seeking new investment - they’re already priced in and getting their returns.

        You can literally find examples of these contracts online by searching for “investor agreement sample.”

        People usually only care about your growth as a function of how it correlates to a rise in your value. Most stock growth is entirely based on feels - it’s closer to social media than it is to any sort of accounting.