GrappleHat@lemmy.ml to Privacy@lemmy.mlEnglish · 1 year agoGoogle loses antitrust case vs Epic Games. Jury rules Google Play store constitutes an illegal monopolywww.theverge.comexternal-linkmessage-square35fedilinkarrow-up1180arrow-down13 cross-posted to: technology@lemmy.worldtechnology@lemmy.world
arrow-up1177arrow-down1external-linkGoogle loses antitrust case vs Epic Games. Jury rules Google Play store constitutes an illegal monopolywww.theverge.comGrappleHat@lemmy.ml to Privacy@lemmy.mlEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square35fedilink cross-posted to: technology@lemmy.worldtechnology@lemmy.world
minus-squareashtrix@lemmy.calinkfedilinkarrow-up37arrow-down2·1 year agoThe Apple case was decided by a judge and this by a jury, which makes a big difference
minus-squarebionicjoey@lemmy.calinkfedilinkarrow-up12arrow-down1·1 year agoHow exactly does a jury trial work in a case like this? Aren’t juries supposed to be “peers” of the accused? How can a corporation be tried by a jury of its peers?
minus-squarea_fancy_kiwi@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up10·1 year agoIn the US, corporations are people
minus-squareOmega_Haxors@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up2·1 year agoGoing off history, fascist dictators.
minus-squareOmega_Haxors@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 year agoPointing out contradictions is the only way to ever get any shit done.
The Apple case was decided by a judge and this by a jury, which makes a big difference
How exactly does a jury trial work in a case like this? Aren’t juries supposed to be “peers” of the accused? How can a corporation be tried by a jury of its peers?
In the US, corporations are people
Yeah but who are their peers?
deleted
Going off history, fascist dictators.
Pointing out contradictions is the only way to ever get any shit done.