• Rooki@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    Still… its closed source. I can tell you that my closed source code that i only have access, doesnt track your movement everywhere. “Trust me bro” move. The first sentence doesnt make sense at all.

    They added noise and then removed the noise?

    • octalfudge@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      You’re absolutely right that closed source makes it much harder to verify that software does what it’s supposed to do. I’m not sure in the absence of ability to view the source how we can be sure that Apple does what they say. (maybe network packet sniffing? Are there privacy audits? Must it be disclosed in GDPR requests?) I hope someone with the appropriate qualifications is able to chime in on this.

      I’m sorry for my poor explanation, and unfortunately I do not specialise in differential privacy. My layman’s understanding is that they add noise to the segments of your navigation before sending it to themselves. Once they receive the noisy data, if they average out many samples, the noise is “averaged out” in aggregate statistics. I hope an expert on differential privacy is able to chime in.