Sandbag@lemmy.world to Selfhosted@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agoIs moving to IPv6 worth it?message-squaremessage-square143fedilinkarrow-up1118arrow-down16file-text
arrow-up1112arrow-down1message-squareIs moving to IPv6 worth it?Sandbag@lemmy.world to Selfhosted@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square143fedilinkfile-text
minus-squareorangeboats@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·1 year agoMy ISP delegated me only one /64.
minus-squareduncesplayed@lemmy.onelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 year agoThat’s less fun. I believe you’ve either got to put everything on one SLAAC network (no static IPs), or you’ve got to use DHCPv6 (with a smaller network size) instead of SLAAC.
minus-squareorangeboats@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·1 year agoRight, everything is on SLAAC. My ISP only delegates /48 ~ /56 to business customers (according to their customer service). Thankfully, RFC 7217 made SLAAC-only networks sufferable - you don’t to expose your MAC address to the entire world for stable addressing.
My ISP delegated me only one /64.
That’s less fun. I believe you’ve either got to put everything on one SLAAC network (no static IPs), or you’ve got to use DHCPv6 (with a smaller network size) instead of SLAAC.
Right, everything is on SLAAC. My ISP only delegates /48 ~ /56 to business customers (according to their customer service).
Thankfully, RFC 7217 made SLAAC-only networks sufferable - you don’t to expose your MAC address to the entire world for stable addressing.