Meta has 30 days to stop using the name

  • Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    172
    ·
    11 months ago

    Same name, same industry - digital messaging.

    If Meta didn’t have a massive amount of money and lawyers, this would be a VERY easy case to win.

    Meta decided they wanted the name, tried to buy it, and then opted to knowingly rip it out of a smaller company’s hands. What a bunch of assholes.

    • Fredselfish@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      57
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      Why was he hell bent on using the name Threads. Every time I hear it makes me think of the Dragon Riders or Pern. Not messaging app. Fuck Meta hope the real Threads company wins.

      • glimse@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        40
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        I agree with the last sentence but Threads seems like a completely appropriate name for the service. Online conversations have been called threads for decades

      • anonionfinelyminced@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        11 months ago

        “Drummer, beat, and piper, blow,
        Harper, strike, and soldier, go.
        Free the flame and sear the grasses
        Till the dawning Red Star passes.”

      • Chris@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        It makes me think of the apocalyptic nuclear war drama. Quite appropriate.

      • Jolteon@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        To be fair, apps like that do tend to encourage people to isolate themselves at home, rather than going to meet people outside.

    • seitanic@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      36
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      What a bunch of assholes.

      Yeah, it’s really surprising that an ethical, upstanding company like Meta would pull a dick move like that. It’s so out of character.

      • mark@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        an ethical, upstanding company like Meta

        the hardest I’ve laughed this week 🥲

    • snooggums@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      11 months ago

      It seems like money shouldn’t be able to buy a win in court for something so obvious, but here we are.

  • AutoTL;DR@lemmings.worldB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    11 months ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    Dr. John Yardley, Threads Ltd’s managing director told Gizmodo in an email that Threads Ltd. waited four months to reach out to Meta to obtain enough legal advice to ensure they could “proceed with action with any reasonable confidence of winning it.”

    Threads Ltd., owned by JPY Ltd., widely promoted the company since 2014, two years after it trademarked its name.

    The company said in its letter that since its inception, it has licensed nearly 1,000 organizations globally and claims its sales are growing by an average of 200% per year.

    “We recognize that this is a classic ‘David and Goliath’ battle with Meta,” Yardley said in the letter.

    Meta launched Threads in June and gained 100 million users within the first five days, surpassing its competitor X.

    A month later, Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg said more than half of Threads users stopped using the platform.


    The original article contains 393 words, the summary contains 146 words. Saved 63%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!