Low power TV station takes advantage of the fact most TVs support H.264 and HEVC video codecs to broadcast 14 HD programs over the air.

  • Shdwdrgn@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    10 months ago

    It’s funny that most people forget OTA TV still exists and that you don’t need to pay to see a lot of shows. For the cost of one month’s service fees you can get a decent amplified antenna, but if you’re near any large cities that broadcast you can get a cheap cardboard-sandwiched antenna for less than $10 and requires no installation. It’s cool to see some people are taking advantage of the open spectrum and newer technologies.

    • muffedtrims@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      10 months ago

      I’ve been running a Tivo OTA since 2017. Haven’t paid for local channels since then. Paid once for the box and a good outdoor antenna. Now I only have Disney/Hulu bundle for free with my cell phone data package.

    • Cort@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      10 months ago

      Lol, that’s just how Antenna man has always done thumbnails. As a semi-regular viewer, I can say the interview with the small broadcaster really elevates this video above most of his other content. It’s a pretty fantastic and informative video.

  • VicksVaporBBQrub@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    This is interesting. I use OTA antenna tv everyday, almost exclusively. I almost forgot OTA HDTV still uses the mpeg2-ts, similar to the dvd codec. Newer tv hardwares (>2010-ish) all can decode mpeg4, theoretically, since they utilize internet streaming apps and services.
    I smell a new format war a comin’.
    I say, go right for mpeg4 h.265, or higher. Instead of mixing mpeg2 and mpeg4, like the video demonstrated. Because no way am i going to “buy” a DRM-protected thing for every broadcaster… I’m currently pulling-in 20+ stations.

    And that may be the other format war… to pay or not to pay.

  • RedWeasel@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    10 months ago

    I am not really sure what ATSC3.0 brings that 1.0 doesn’t have besides the codec features. I doubt it adds much on the bandwidth side.

    • partial_accumen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      10 months ago

      What I Think its adding is additional broadcast streams over the internet but integrated into the TV experience. This also means that all ATSC 3.0 TVs require a live internet connection, I think. So think the worst invasive monitoring and control of smart TVs forced on you just to watch broadcast television.

      I have zero interest in ATSC 3.0.

  • Yots92@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    What about the intrinsic quality of the broadcast programs? Shit stays shit even at 8k resolution